Previous Page  50 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 50 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

[ 50 ]

TOBACCO BUSINESS INTERNATIONAL

[ 01

/

02

|

17 ]

NEWS

&

TRENDS

Colorado residents rejected a ballot initiative

aimed at increasing cigarette taxes in the state,

with approximately 53 percent of voters reject-

ing the idea, according to

The Denver Post

.

Prior to the election, Smoker Friendly’s

Mary Szarmach wrote a compelling op-ed

opposing the measure, which would have

boosted the cigarette levy by $1.75 per pack.

Published in the Daily Camera, Szarmach’s

piece described the tax as potentially “disas-

trous for our business,” referring to Smoker

Friendly’s 102-store chain of gas, tobacco and

convenience stores.

“The last time we weathered a tax increase

of this magnitude, we had to close 19 percent of

our stores and lay off over 70 hard-working em-

ployees,” she wrote. “Tax increases such as these

also make for a less safe work environment.

Break-ins and armed robberies have grown be-

tween 10 and 20 percent in other states where

this type of tax increase has taken place.”

According to Szarmach, Amendment 72

offers few guarantees that the $315 million in

Voters Just Said

No

toColorado’s

CigTax Hike

Amendment 72 was defeated

in the election on November 8.

new tax dollars would be spent appropriately. 

Furthermore, Szarmach went on, “most of

the new revenue generated by this tax is ded-

icated to programs that have not even been

determined. Fifty-one percent of new tax dol-

lars fund grant awards where guidelines have

not even been written. The lax oversight for

hundreds of millions of dollars creates conflict

of interest concerns,” she wrote, adding that,

while the more than $1 billion that Colorado

has already received from tobacco companies

under the Master Settlement Agreement was

earmarked for youth tobacco prevention and

tobacco cessation programs, most of the mon-

ey has been spent on unrelated government

programs.

“Before Colorado locks hundreds of mil-

lions of dollars in new spending into the state’s

constitution, voters deserve to know which pro-

grams this money funds, and that it won’t be

wasted,” she asserted. “Our state needs money

for roads and schools, yet Amendment 72 does

not dedicate a dime to these pressing issues.”

INTRODUCED FOR THE THIRD TIME

in 10 years, California’s Proposition 56

finally passed—and by a wide margin

(63 percent to 37 percent). The measure

will boost California’s cigarette excise tax

by $2 per pack, up from the current 87

cents per pack. In addition to cigarettes,

the ballot measure also called for a hike

in taxes on other tobacco products (OTP),

including smokeless tobacco and cigars.

Electronic cigarettes are also included

in the measure, which calls for vapor

products to be subject to the same taxes

that California currently imposes on other

smokeless tobacco products, which will

be raised in line with the $2 per pack

excise tax increase on cigarettes.

The bottom line? Taxes on e-cigarette

liquid containing nicotine could be as

much as 67 percent, raising the amount

vapers pay for a standard 30ml bottle

from $20 to $30.

California was one of the few states

to pass a tobacco tax hike. Voters in

Missouri, Colorado and North Dakota

rejected similar ballot measures in the

November 8 election.

California

Cig Tax Ballot

Initiative

Passes

Proposition 56 will

raise the state excise

tax on tobacco products,

including electronic

cigarettes.