Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  87 / 102 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 87 / 102 Next Page
Page Background

’’

gree, 3

rd

Degree and 4

th

Degree, adds Verleur, who

notes that while the company is excited about entering

a new market, it is by no means abandoning its tradi-

tional nicotine-based vapor business from an innova-

tion and marketing standpoint. That’s partly because

the company’s cannabis market strategy—i.e. not sell-

ing actual cannabis—foregoes much of the emerging

category’s profit potential.

“The vast majority of what makes up the MSRP of

cannabis is actually the cannabis liquid, not the device,”

explains Verleur. “We believe the space is an $800 mil-

lion category, but to the electronics manufacturer like

me, the most we can achieve of that MSRP would be 20

percent—and that’s without giving up a margin—and

retailers in the head shop space are accustomed to a 50

percent margin.”

On the plus side, however, customers willing to shell

out for costly herbs are less price-sensitive when it comes

to the cost of the device they’ll use to vape them. Also,

the players in the space are relatively unsophisticated,

which gives VMR, which has a wealth of experience

in both vapor manufacturing and retail, a window of

opportunity. “I can pick up share without much inter-

ference from competitors, other than Firefly and PAX,

whereas in vapor I’m competing with Big Tobacco and

the Goliaths,” says Verleur, who nevertheless remains

committed to the vapor marketplace.

VMR’S

VAPOR POSITIONING

After the FDA’s deeming regulations were released in

May of 2016, VMR CEO Jan Verleur issued a state-

ment charging that the “all-or-nothing approach” that

would “subject electronic vaporizers to an unnecessar-

ily onerous approval process” threatened “to eliminate

99 percent of the electronic vaporizer industry.” Iron-

ically, a year later, it’s that very scenario that is paving

the path for VMR’s continued success.

Even as he argued vigorously against FDA regulations

that would subject vapor products to the same restric-

tions and regulations as combustible cigarettes, Verleur

also hedged his bets, working strenuously to bring a slew

of prototypes onto retail shelves before the first deeming

regulation predicate product deadline hit. Now that fore-

thought is paying off. “Everything we are launching un-

der the V2 brand between now and the end of 2018 are

things that were actually precepted prior to the August

8, 2016 deadline,” he explains. “We rushed about 150

prototypes to market, many of them handmade because

we didn’t have time to complete the industrial tooling, in

select stores in the same packaging it would ultimately be

sold in. Now we’ll be [rolling] those products out in the

next few quarters and over the next year without having

to undergo the PMTA process.”

VMR banked on getting those new introductions

into continuous commerce before the August 8, 2016

The vast majority

of what makes

up the MSRP

of cannabis is

actually the

cannabis liquid,

not the device.

’’