Previous Page  37 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 37 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

SEVERAL MONTHS AND A PRESIDENTIAL

election later, we find ourselves in uncharted territory—

not the place in which we found ourselves last August

where the regulatory walls were going up and no one

really saw a way out, but new territory where over-

regulation shaped by anti-tobacco groups with agendas

can perhaps be changed.

The future isn’t just about what a Republican Congress

(read: one more concerned about impact of regulations

on businesses) and president can do for vaping. It is

about the broader chance to do something greater

the

chance to shift the conversation away from the subject

of vaping and focus on larger harm-reduction issues that

positively affect consumer health, while at the same time

supporting a vibrant market for vaping and other harm-

reducing products.

Those of us immersed in the vapor industry eat, sleep

and breathe vapor (sometimes literally). Our world is

vapor-centric, but it doesn’t have to be that way. There

are those who support overall harm-reduction efforts

that include vapor, but aren’t limited to that one product

category. Overall, the vapor space has been very limited

in its scope, but that is changing.

At the forefront is the Consumer Advocates for

Smoke-Free Alternatives Association (CASAA).

Founded in 2009, CASAA’s core mission is to “raise

awareness and protect consumers’ rights to access

reduced-harm alternatives to smoking.” Julie Woessner,

executive director, explained that CASAA “was created

as an answer to the misinformation being shared by

our government and members of the tobacco control

community, and in response to FDA’s aggressive

attempt to remove vapor products from the market by

categorizing them as unapproved drugs/drug-delivery

devices.”

To date, CASAA has largely been involved in

advocacy efforts focused on vapor products because

threats to consumer access have been greater. However,

it’s important to note that the roots of their mission are

far broader. The organization has always been focused

on tobacco harm reduction and on the recognition that

smoke-free nicotine-containing products are inherently

far less dangerous than smoking. This makes CASAA a

proactive leader in the vapor space.

Vapor products are one of the ever-growing tools in

the tobacco harm-reduction toolbox, but there are more.

When I spoke with Woessner about CASAA’s initial

focus on harm reduction, she told me that CASAA

has always been committed to providing smokers (and

nonsmokers) with honest information about low-risk

alternatives to smoking so that they can make informed

decisions regarding their health and lifestyle choices,

and advocate for themselves.

The vapor space has had a difficult time building

strong bridges with tobacco harm-reduction advocates

or proponents of “quit or die,” likely because they have

had a difficult time seeing past the idea of vaping and its

similarity to cigarette smoking (though it would be hard

to argue today that vaping and cigarette smoking bear

much resemblance to each other). Because the message has

primarily been vapor first and harm reduction second, it

has been relatively easy for detractors of vapor products to

dismiss vapor as a “one-off” engineered by the big tobacco

companies.

Now we have the opportunity to make the vapor

fight about the bigger fight: tobacco harm reduction.

Making this shift will require an acceptance by the vapor

space of other alternative products without judgment,

an acceptance predicated on the true meaning of harm

reduction: that it’s not about just one product.

CASAA’s plans for 2017 include a new advocacy

platform to increase member engagement opportunities

and expansion of advocacy efforts to include new low-

risk products. If the rest of the vapor space expanded

their tent similarly, we could set the stage for a large-

scale comprehensive effort to address outdated and

illogical regulatory and legislative issues.

The deeming regulations that took effect in 2016 need

changing. As of this writing, the predicate date remains

the same and harm-reduction technology is frozen in

time. If we are able to unfreeze the clock on innovation,

we can greatly expand the potential for newer and better

products. By embracing all low-risk alternatives, we

increase our chances of success. By being inclusive, we

stand to gain more allies. By being proactive, we give

ourselves the head start we needed in 2009.

CASAA:

New

Opportunities

Expanding advocacy efforts beyond vaping to other

harm-reducing methods can only help the cause.

The organization

has always

been focused on

tobacco harm

reduction and on

the recognition

that smoke-

free nicotine-

containing

products are

inherently far

less dangerous

than smoking.

Former executive director

of SFATA, Cynthia

Cabrera is an indepen-

dent consultant at The

Cating Group.

VAPOR ADVOCACY

[ CYNTHIA CABRERA ]

[ T O B O N L I N E . C O M ]

TOBACCO BUSINESS INTERNATIONAL

[ 37 ]