Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  10 / 48 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 10 / 48 Next Page
Page Background

24

TOBACCO BUSINESS INTERNATIONAL

MARCH/APRIL 2015

TMA REPORT

important for us to understand the impact,

particularly on youth, before we allow the

full-fledged spread of these e-cigarettes

and then later have problems that we have

to deal with.”

…The

California Department of Public

Health

(CDPH) on January 28 released

a report saying that e-cigs emit toxic

chemicals, get users addicted to nicotine

and are a “community health threat” that

should be regulated like tobacco products.

Professor Michael Siegel of Boston

University’s School of Public Health said

that the CDPH report is heavily biased and

cherry-picks studies that agree with its

position while ignoring studies that don’t.

He notes that the report’s conclusion

that “[t]here is no scientific evidence that

e-cigarettes help smokers successfully

quit traditional cigarettes or that they

reduce their consumption” is based on

only one observational study conducted

by Dr. Katrina Vickerman, which included

many smokers who were not using e-cigs

in their attempt to quit and was not even

designed to examine the efficacy of e-cigs

for smoking cessation. The report did not

consider any of the three clinical trials—

two led by Dr. Riccardo Polosa in Italy

and one led by Dr. Chris Bullen in New

Zealand—that provide the most rigorous

scientific information currently available

on the efficacy of e-cigs.

…On his personal blog entitled “The

Counterfactual,” Clive Bates points out

that commentators, including the CDC,

Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids,

The

New York Times

and

The Guardian,

are

highlighting the

rise in calls to poison

control centers in the U.S.

regarding

e-cigs and e-liquids over the past several

years, from 271 in 2011 to 3,957 in 2014.

He says that increase can be explained by

the rapid rise in vaping and “the increased

fear about these products arising from

the negative publicity and fear-mongering

in the press and by ‘public health

organizations,’” adding that when put into

context, e-cigs and e-liquids represent

only 0.06 percent of nearly 2.6 million calls

to the poison control centers in 2013.

…Commenting on the recent peer-

reviewed letter in the

New England

Journal of Medicine

by researchers

from Portland State University (PSU),

which said that formaldehyde was

detected when they ran a vaporizer

at a high voltage and concluded that

a heavy user of a vaporizer at the

high voltage was 5 to 15 times more

likely to get cancer than a longtime

smoker,

The New York Times

’ op-ed

columnist Joe Nocera wrote that the

study “fits right into [the] dynamic” of

“many in the public health community

treat[ing] e-cigarettes as every bit as

evil” as cigarettes, and of anti-tobacco

activists “irrationally embrac[ing]” any

news suggesting that vaping is bad for

health, resulting in the decline in the

percentage of smokers who believe

e-cigs to be safer than combustible

cigarettes from 84 percent in 2010 to 65

percent in 2013, though the conclusion

drawn by PSU researchers is highly

misleading given that people do not

vape at a high voltage because of the

horrible taste caused by overheating

the e-liquid.

…The

U.S.

Federal

Aviation

Administration is advising airlines to

consider banning e-cigs in checked airline

luggage

, noting that e-cigs have started

two fires since August 2014.

TBI