Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  8 / 51 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 8 / 51 Next Page
Page Background

20

TOBACCO BUSINESS INTERNATIONAL

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2015

TMA REPORT

By FARRELL DELMAN

…The

Food

and

Drug

Administration’s (FDA) Center for

TobaccoProducts (CTP) issued

warning

letters

to six online retailers for selling

“not substantially equivalent” products

across state lines.

…FDA continues to review

tobacco

product marketing applications

. In

November 2014, 24 substantially

equivalent (SE) orders and six not

substantially equivalent (NSE) orders

were issued, while companies

withdrew 17 SE reports from the

review process.

The New York Times

reported

on Swedish Match North America’s

(SMNA)

modified-risk

tobacco

product

(MRTP) application that

requests FDA to remove two smokeless

warning labels and say that SMNA’s

snus presents lower health risks than

cigarettes. The newspaper said that

SMNA is raising a broader question

of whether the regulation of tobacco

products should align with the degree

of harm presented by a given product,

an issue that has split the public

health community, with some arguing

that replacing one harmful tobacco

product with another is wrongheaded,

while others are apparently endorsing

strategies to distinguish the “cleanest,

least harmful” methods of nicotine

delivery, even if doing so might result

in dual use.

…In a November letter, U.S. House

Speaker John Boehner, House

Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy and

Chair of the Energy and Commerce

Committee Fred Upton asked that

FDA change the

grandfather date for

proposed deeming regulations

(DR)

for currently unregulated tobacco

and e-vapor products from February

15, 2007 to either April 25, 2014 (the

date the DR proposal was published)

or to the effective date of the final DR.

The letter was addressed to Health

and Human Services Secretary Sylvia

Burwell and cited concerns that the

proposed grandfather date would

create

“unnecessary

regulatory

burdens” and discriminate against

unregulated products, making it

virtually impossible for current e-cigs

to claim substantial equivalence to a

predicate product. Commenting on

the request, Professor Michael Siegel

of Boston University’s School of Public

Health expressed agreement and

noted that he would go further, asking

that FDA not require new product

applications for any products, as the

new product application requirement

will stifle innovation and make it

difficult for newer, potentially safer

products to enter the market.

…CTP is establishing

a public

docket

(FDA-2014-N-1936-0001)

inviting interested parties to submit by

April 15, 2015 “comments, supported

by research and data, regarding

e-cigarettes and the public health.”

…CTP said it launched two

new

national advertisements

as part of

On the fda…

Farrell Delman,

President, TMA

Breaking News From the TMA

The following are excerpts from harm reduction,

tobacco regulation and other tobacco-related news.